Many years ago a scientific survey found that of the pollution of swimming pools 60% came from swimsuits and only 40% from human bodies. Furthermore, the hygiene aspect is emphasized by the poster who commented that if anyone were to be banned from swimming pools it would be babies and those who have no bladder control. The objection from the mothers, although said to be one of hygiene, is simply prejudice and puritanical sanctimoniousness.

   Although I would like to keep an open mind from the point of view of the mothers, I can't help but find myself confused at the real reason for their objections. Hygiene? Really? At what point have they forgotten that a swimming pool is essentially a giant bath that anyone can get in and the only clothing requirement is a skimpy lycra suit? We all must remember the obligatory verrucae initiation from our youth. And what about mother and baby sessions? If hygiene is really an issue, then surely the targets should be those with the least bladder control. It all seems rather ridiculous. Pools are well aware of issues surrounding public safety which is why they take the time to chlorinate the water. These sessions, I understand, are private and take place away from other swimmers and at times when the second pool is adults only. Why mothers would object to this I do not understand. From a personal point of view, I see no reason to instil the idea in children that our naked bodies are something to be ashamed of, or that it is okay to be intolerate because others are more comfortable with their nudity than we are. In this case the children may not have even been aware of any issue until it was raised. So what good has this actually done?

   "I am concerned about the hygiene aspect."

Seriously? Fluid dynamics, anyone? Hell, ever heard of shrinkage? That wouldn't happen if things stayed dry under the trunks.

Over-protective twit.

   How very dare you? This is pure homophobia! How can Elaine and other mums not understand that swimming costumes are not watertight!